For paid media & marketing managers · $10k–$100k/mo spend

The paid media diagnostic that already knows your account.

No prompting. No API keys. No context lost between sessions. Venti watches your campaigns, finds the root cause, and tells you what it ruled out — automatically.

See if I'm a fitTry live demo →

Why DIY breaks

What most people hit
vs what Venti does instead.

Whether you tried Claude MCP setups or you're just comparing options — same walls, different fix. Other tools tell you what's declining. Venti tells you what broke, where in the causal chain, what it ruled out, and what to do before you touch anything.

1No automatic diagnosis — you check dashboards yourself
Venti watches your accounts automatically. You don’t check it. It tells you.
2Reprompting context every session
Venti already knows your account. No setup. No prompting. No context lost between sessions.
3Context gets blurred over time in long chat threads
Every diagnostic run starts from a clean, structured account model — not a degrading chat thread.
4API keys, MCP config, and code — too complex to maintain
One connection. No API keys. No code. No IT ticket.
5Manual tools and skills you have to install and wire up
Venti comes with the diagnostic framework built in. You don’t install anything or prompt anything into existence.
6Generic AI that doesn’t think like a media buyer
The diagnostic logic follows how a senior media buyer actually thinks — macro first, platform second, account third.
7Expensive token waste re-teaching the model every week
You’re not paying to train it. It already knows what to look for.
8Black box answers with no verification
Every diagnosis shows what it ruled out and why. Full evidence chain. Nothing hidden.
9No learning mechanism — same mistakes every run
Every run updates Venti’s model of your account. It gets faster and more accurate over time.

The output

A diagnosis you can
defend in five minutes.

Analysis journey · Meta + Google · last 7 days2 critical3 warning

Signals detected

Meta Ads CPM
↑42% vs your normal
$18.40
Critical
Google Ads CPC
↑31% vs your normal
$2.14
Critical
Creative frequency (7d)
↑28% vs your normal
4.9
Warning
Prospecting ROAS
↓50% vs your normal
1.4x
Warning
Branded impression share
↓14% vs your normal
61%
Warning

CPM vs your normal

Spike crosses your 90-day band on Fri — not a reporting glitch.

Diagnosis

Creative fatigue → CPM pressure → ROAS collapse
Macro: auction pressure stable · Platform: Meta + Google aligned
Verified

6 hypotheses falsified — audience overlap, budget pacing, attribution drift, seasonality, landing-page CVR drop, and offer fatigue ruled out with evidence.

This is what a diagnosis looks like when the AI already knows your account, your benchmarks, and your market context.

Verified patterns

Three diagnoses from one run —
with falsification, not vibes.

Each example shows the causal chain, what was ruled out, and confidence scores — the same verification layer you get on a live account.

Confirmed · 4.2 seconds
Creative fatigue driving the entire ROAS collapse
Creative freq 4.8→5.2→CPM +42%→CPC up→ROAS −50%
Cross-referenced: Meta Ads · Google Ads · GA4 paid sessions · 3 ad account signals
Ruled out: audience overlap spike, budget pacing error, iOS attribution drift — z-score −2.4σ on frequency vs your 90-day baseline.
Silent for 18 days — no platform alert
Meta pixel event gap since account restructure
Purchase event under-counting→Paid CVR looks −38%→CPA inflating→Budget cuts on wrong signal
Corroborated: Meta Events Manager · GA4 purchase rate · Google Ads conversion lag
Ruled out: true landing-page CVR drop, offer fatigue, seasonality — hypothesis confidence 0.82 after 14 contraindications checked.
Early warning · 3 weeks ahead
Competitor pressure building — CPM headwinds incoming
Competitor ad spend +31%→Branded keyword CPM rising→Impression share −14%→ROAS pressure in 2–3 weeks
External auction signals · Search impression share · GA4 paid traffic mix
Ruled out: internal creative rotation, budget cap, audience saturation — signal weight 0.74 with full causal chain documented.
z-score: −2.4σ·Hypothesis confidence: 0.87·Signal weight: 0.74·Contraindications checked: 20
Every finding is scored, ranked, and falsified — not just surfaced.

Want to see if Venti is right for your account?

Answer 4 questions. We'll show you exactly how Venti would diagnose your specific setup.

See if I'm a fit

Quick answers

Built for managers —
not another ad-platform copilot.

I already have AI inside Meta / Google — why would I need this?

Those copilots help you work inside each ad account. Venti is for when Meta and Google tell different stories and you need one ranked read of what broke, what was ruled out, and what to do next — before you change budgets.

Why not use a general AI chat or MCP setup instead?

General assistants need you to bring context every session. Venti is wired to your ad accounts on a schedule, with baselines for what normal looks like for your spend — and a repeatable run that ends with falsification and evidence, not a paragraph of guesses.

Is this an attribution or tracking product?

No. Venti diagnoses using data you already have in connected ad platforms — correlation, causal chain, ranked options — without replacing your measurement stack.

Paid media · Meta & Google

Stop reconciling tabs —
start with a diagnosis that sticks.

Venti already knows your account before you open a single chat. See if your spend and role are a fit for early access.

See if I'm a fit